Just One Day by Gayle Forman
First disclaimer: I've read Gayle Forman's If I Stay and Where She Went which are both very beautiful books. It was in the time before I began this blog *wiggly fingers* so I have not blogged about them. However, come a rainy day and I pick them up again, I'll be sure to blog about them.
Second disclaimer: This is an older, young adult story. It begins with the ending of senior year of high school and the beginnings of college. With that in mind, sex does come up. It's not porn, it's never like, "THEY DID THIS, AND THAT AND OOOO LA LAAAA". No, it just kind of happens in the 'you don't get to see anything but you know it happens' sense. So really, it wasn't that big of a deal. Sex happens. Sex happens with people who are a lot younger than 18. That is all.
So an amazon summary to get over disclaimers, "A breathtaking journey toward self-discovery and true love, from the author of If I Stay
When sheltered American good girl Allyson "LuLu" Healey first meets laid-back Dutch actor Willem De Ruiter at an underground performance of Twelfth Night in England, there’s an undeniable spark. After just one day together, that spark bursts into a flame, or so it seems to Allyson, until the following morning, when she wakes up after a whirlwind day in Paris to discover that Willem has left. Over the next year, Allyson embarks on a journey to come to terms with the narrow confines of her life, and through Shakespeare, travel, and a quest for her almost-true-love, to break free of those confines.
Just One Day is the first in a sweepingly romantic duet of novels. Willem’s story—Just One Year—is coming soon!" AMAZON SUMMARY THAT TEASES ABOUT SEQUEL
On a super side note, and I'm sure this is just because I get a little obnoxious sometimes, and sleep deprived and whatever else that concocts madness, there were several typos in this book. There were a few instances of missing words, and some blatant spelling errors. But again, they were few and far between. HOWEVER, editor/publisher/author/whoever can help the book before the world gets it; be a little more careful? Eh? Than I can be a little less obnoxious. Maybe.
DAMN IT BATMAN, I WANT THE SEQUEL RIGHT NOW. *Aggravated noises.*
(I've started to replace Batman with anything that could be a religious reference in my speech. Life improvement +1,000.)
My brain is so distracted.
Let's try this again.
So Just One Day is about Allyson or 'Lulu'. Allyson's life has been dictated by her parents, or more specifically her mother since day 1 it seems. Every moment has been mapped out and planned out so she can become a successful doctor. As a graduation present, Allyson's folks sent her on a European tour which her best friend Melanie also goes on. Allyson always goes with the flow except for this one time; she and Melanie sneak away from the tour to see a mysterious boy perform the Twelfth Night in a park. She meets the mysterious boy 'Willem' at breakfast and immediate sparks happen between them. Willem dubs her Lulu and Allyson goes to London with him on a whim; on the eager chance of adventure.
They spend a marvelous day in London doing things that take Lulu's breath away and for once it seems that she's actually lived. They trundle through the city in weird ways with no plans and seem to fly by the seat of their pants. That is until the next morning she wakes up alone without him.
Thus begins her year after him where she fumbles through college and meets a collection of interesting people along the way and truly begins to discover herself outside of the guidelines of her mother.
I really fell in love with this book and I cannot WAIT for the sequel.
I think this is a better book of tackling the awkward transition from high school to college, discovering what friendships really mean, and discovering your own sense of self.
Really awesome read.
Happy reading!
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Freaks
Freaks by Kieran Larwood
This makes number three. Unreadable.
Alright first, when it has the claim of 'weirdest crime fighters ever', I immediately think of many, many strange superheroes in the DC universe, Marvel Universe, Astro City Comics, and even Dark Horse universe (those were all comic book universes. SO NERDY AM I). So I got pretty stoked about it, especially with the cover and the description. Here's what I'm talking about with the description.
Amazon summary, "Weirdest. Crime Fighters. Ever.
Sheba, the fur-faced Wolfgirl, can sniff out a threat from miles away. Monkeyboy clambers up buildings in the blink of an eye -- then drops deadly stink bombs of his own making (yes, THAT kind)! Sister Moon sees in the dark, and moves at the speed of light. Born with weird abnormalities that make them misfits, these FREAKS spend their nights on public display, trapped in a traveling Victorian sideshow. But during the day, they put their strange talents to use: They solve the most sinister crimes. And in a dank, desperate world of crooks and child-snatchers, they're determined to defend London's most innocent victims: the street urchins disappearing from the city's streets." AMAZON LINK OF LIESSSSS
I TRIED SO HARD TO GET HALFWAY THROUGH THE BOOK. SO HARD.
I made it to page 82 out of 223.
This book had a weird style of writing. By weird, I mean it's clearly intended for children (young adults? It seems like children from the tone) to read, and yet it actually reads like it's for an adult that likes to read children's fiction. There's a difference. I'll elaborate.
In the beginning of the book, Sheba (the Wolfgirl) is introduced to London. So she's telling us everything she's seeing. Alright, that's fine. But what is this? "Soon there were clusters of houses, then small hamlets with their own inns and churches, followed by the junk mountains," (Larwood, page 21, Freaks). They also use 'paupers', 'mudlarks', and other like terms to describe the different type of folk of the city. I don't think that hamlet, pauper, or mudlark are terms that are commonly known to younger adults (or children, damn book). I could be wrong, but even I was a little thrown off by hamlets. I wondered if it was a Shakespeare reference before looking it up and going, "Oooohhh, why not just say villages?" Perhaps it's a period thing. If it is, I would suggest making the voice more like the period.
A lot of the characters in this story seem to be unaffected by the period in which they interact. There's not a lot of racism, prejudice, etc etc in their voices that would reflect the period. They kind of amble around and go like, "Man, I hope we solve this mystery" and nothing happens. (Twenty points if you got that reference.)
Let me begin about Sheba. First of all, she's got amnesia (I am so sick of amnesia characters. OH MAN, I DON'T KNOW MY PAST BEFORE THE BOOK STARTED, I BET THAT WILL COME INTO PLAY WITH THE STORY. HUR DUR HUR). Second of all, she's a Wolfgirl. Let me refer back to my nerdy self knowledge; Wolverine from the Marvel universe. Wolverine has amnesia of sorts depending on where in the timeline you read Marvel universe comics, and he's 'WOLVERINE'. Wolverine has supreme animal-like senses, a wicked healing ability, and enhanced physical capabilities. He's also got wicked claws and had adamantium bonded to his skeleton (and claw things). WOLVERINE WIKI, EDUMACATION STARTS WITH WIKI AND LEADS ELSEWHERE
Anyways, let me draw some more similarities between Sheba and Wolverine. Sheba has nails that look a little more like claws, small sharp teeth, and when she's frightened/angry/excited, her nose puckers into a snout (which I really question where she gets the extra flesh/muscles/skin etc to make a snout), her eyes flash, her skin bristles, and she growls. Wolverine has claws, has fangs, and definitely snarls/growls etc when he's angry.
So when I was reading this I got really annoyed. I found myself muttering, "She's the female Wolverine; she's a child, has been tweaked slightly to suit the authors needs and probably to avoid copyright infringement, but she's a female Wolverine." I didn't get far enough into the book to find out if her amnesia gets cured, or if she has healing factors, or blah blah blah.
Moving on.
So the book introduces us to other freaks and I'm sure they're fascinating as all get out as well, but they're 'shrouded in mystery' *wiggly fingers*. There's a point of suspense, and there's a point of annoyance. This is annoying. Yes, the book does deliver the physical description of the characters to a point, but it doesn't reveal their past lives much and seems to want to work into a 'appearances aren't everything, it's the personality that counts' but, it wandered around this idea a lot. I'm not entirely convinced that they're anywhere near as important as Sheba, hence me ignoring them.
So Sheba is part of a Freak show and is bought by another Freak show (nothing says victimizing characters like slavery!) and taken to London with all the other Freaks. There she begins to 'act' in the Freak show when a little girl named Til comes in, isn't scared of her but more in awe, gives her a marble and runs (as she snuck into the show). The perspective follows Til for a chapter to discover that she was a mudlark and as she was picking through the mud, some large red tentacle pulled her down into the mud. THUS THE MYSTERY BEGINS.
And my interest was done.
It went all scooby doo (Scooby Doo I would say is represented by the two-headed lamb), and seeing as I was already over a third of the way through the book and they weren't fighting crime yet, I'm done.
There just wasn't a whole lot happening to hold my interest, and yes they did kind of lead bits and pieces of clues here and there (like Sheba being very curious about an exhibit) that would probably lead to a big reveal, but alas, I find myself uncaring.
Unreadable number three.
Happy reading.
This makes number three. Unreadable.
Alright first, when it has the claim of 'weirdest crime fighters ever', I immediately think of many, many strange superheroes in the DC universe, Marvel Universe, Astro City Comics, and even Dark Horse universe (those were all comic book universes. SO NERDY AM I). So I got pretty stoked about it, especially with the cover and the description. Here's what I'm talking about with the description.
Amazon summary, "Weirdest. Crime Fighters. Ever.
Sheba, the fur-faced Wolfgirl, can sniff out a threat from miles away. Monkeyboy clambers up buildings in the blink of an eye -- then drops deadly stink bombs of his own making (yes, THAT kind)! Sister Moon sees in the dark, and moves at the speed of light. Born with weird abnormalities that make them misfits, these FREAKS spend their nights on public display, trapped in a traveling Victorian sideshow. But during the day, they put their strange talents to use: They solve the most sinister crimes. And in a dank, desperate world of crooks and child-snatchers, they're determined to defend London's most innocent victims: the street urchins disappearing from the city's streets." AMAZON LINK OF LIESSSSS
I TRIED SO HARD TO GET HALFWAY THROUGH THE BOOK. SO HARD.
I made it to page 82 out of 223.
This book had a weird style of writing. By weird, I mean it's clearly intended for children (young adults? It seems like children from the tone) to read, and yet it actually reads like it's for an adult that likes to read children's fiction. There's a difference. I'll elaborate.
In the beginning of the book, Sheba (the Wolfgirl) is introduced to London. So she's telling us everything she's seeing. Alright, that's fine. But what is this? "Soon there were clusters of houses, then small hamlets with their own inns and churches, followed by the junk mountains," (Larwood, page 21, Freaks). They also use 'paupers', 'mudlarks', and other like terms to describe the different type of folk of the city. I don't think that hamlet, pauper, or mudlark are terms that are commonly known to younger adults (or children, damn book). I could be wrong, but even I was a little thrown off by hamlets. I wondered if it was a Shakespeare reference before looking it up and going, "Oooohhh, why not just say villages?" Perhaps it's a period thing. If it is, I would suggest making the voice more like the period.
A lot of the characters in this story seem to be unaffected by the period in which they interact. There's not a lot of racism, prejudice, etc etc in their voices that would reflect the period. They kind of amble around and go like, "Man, I hope we solve this mystery" and nothing happens. (Twenty points if you got that reference.)
Let me begin about Sheba. First of all, she's got amnesia (I am so sick of amnesia characters. OH MAN, I DON'T KNOW MY PAST BEFORE THE BOOK STARTED, I BET THAT WILL COME INTO PLAY WITH THE STORY. HUR DUR HUR). Second of all, she's a Wolfgirl. Let me refer back to my nerdy self knowledge; Wolverine from the Marvel universe. Wolverine has amnesia of sorts depending on where in the timeline you read Marvel universe comics, and he's 'WOLVERINE'. Wolverine has supreme animal-like senses, a wicked healing ability, and enhanced physical capabilities. He's also got wicked claws and had adamantium bonded to his skeleton (and claw things). WOLVERINE WIKI, EDUMACATION STARTS WITH WIKI AND LEADS ELSEWHERE
Anyways, let me draw some more similarities between Sheba and Wolverine. Sheba has nails that look a little more like claws, small sharp teeth, and when she's frightened/angry/excited, her nose puckers into a snout (which I really question where she gets the extra flesh/muscles/skin etc to make a snout), her eyes flash, her skin bristles, and she growls. Wolverine has claws, has fangs, and definitely snarls/growls etc when he's angry.
So when I was reading this I got really annoyed. I found myself muttering, "She's the female Wolverine; she's a child, has been tweaked slightly to suit the authors needs and probably to avoid copyright infringement, but she's a female Wolverine." I didn't get far enough into the book to find out if her amnesia gets cured, or if she has healing factors, or blah blah blah.
Moving on.
So the book introduces us to other freaks and I'm sure they're fascinating as all get out as well, but they're 'shrouded in mystery' *wiggly fingers*. There's a point of suspense, and there's a point of annoyance. This is annoying. Yes, the book does deliver the physical description of the characters to a point, but it doesn't reveal their past lives much and seems to want to work into a 'appearances aren't everything, it's the personality that counts' but, it wandered around this idea a lot. I'm not entirely convinced that they're anywhere near as important as Sheba, hence me ignoring them.
So Sheba is part of a Freak show and is bought by another Freak show (nothing says victimizing characters like slavery!) and taken to London with all the other Freaks. There she begins to 'act' in the Freak show when a little girl named Til comes in, isn't scared of her but more in awe, gives her a marble and runs (as she snuck into the show). The perspective follows Til for a chapter to discover that she was a mudlark and as she was picking through the mud, some large red tentacle pulled her down into the mud. THUS THE MYSTERY BEGINS.
And my interest was done.
It went all scooby doo (Scooby Doo I would say is represented by the two-headed lamb), and seeing as I was already over a third of the way through the book and they weren't fighting crime yet, I'm done.
There just wasn't a whole lot happening to hold my interest, and yes they did kind of lead bits and pieces of clues here and there (like Sheba being very curious about an exhibit) that would probably lead to a big reveal, but alas, I find myself uncaring.
Unreadable number three.
Happy reading.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Anatomy of a Single Girl
Anatomy of a Single Girl by Daria Snadowsky
I have TWO disclaimers for this book! TITILLATING ISN'T IT?
First disclaimer: I didn't fully comprehend this is a sequel to Anatomy of a Boyfriend and gleefully read this book anyways. I probably missed out on some quality character building time and coming of age confidence, but I think the second book hinted and covered a lot of what transpired in the first book that I feel comfortable not reading it.
Second disclaimer: In case you couldn't tell by the title or the book cover, this book does have sex in it. Sex as a topic, sex as a scene, and ways to be safe about sex. If that makes you uncomfortable, read no further. However, I would say that the sex scenes are reduced to simply stating they had sex, where they had it, and very mundane details. It's not anywhere near a pornographic novel, but it more refers to sex like talking about the weather; it's there, everyone is familiar with the weather, but no one needs to discuss it in detail to know exactly what the weather is. So if that doesn't dissuade you, carry on.
Now, to the amazon summary so you can have a more depicted picture of what you're getting into, "With Judy Blume-like honesty and insight, this sequel to Anatomy of a Boyfriend is about life after first love--romance, sex, friendship, family, and the ups and downs of life as a single girl.
After everything that happened—my first boyfriend, my first time, my first breakup—jumping back into the dating game seemed like the least healthy thing I could do. It’s not that I didn’t want to fall in love again, since that’s about the best feeling ever. But as a busy college premed still raw from heartbreak, which is the worst feeling ever, I figured I’d lie low for a while. Of course, as soon as I stopped looking for someone, an impossibly amazing—and devastatingly cute—guy came along, and I learned that having a new boyfriend is the quickest way to recover from losing your old one. The moment we got together, all my preconceptions about romance and sex were turned upside down. I discovered physical and emotional firsts I never knew existed. I learned to let go of my past by living in the present. It was thrilling. It was hot. It was just what the doctor ordered. But I couldn’t avoid my future forever. In Daria Snadowsky’s daring follow-up to Anatomy of a Boyfriend, eighteen-year-old Dominique explores the relationship between love and lust, and the friendships that see us through." AMAZON LINK OF DRAMATIC NOISES
So Dom, Dominque, whichever you like better isn't exactly the most charming of narrators. I gathered based on context clues that her first relationship she liked because she was in love and sought to strengthen that through sex. In the end, when they went off to college, it seems that they broke up and Dom was super heart broken about it. There are a lot of words in this book that seem to 'over-emphasize' what happened; just as a heads up.
So Dom has returned home for the summer in kind of an inner turmoil of lamenting about her dead relationship, trying to enjoy her friendship with Amy, and of course bumping into Guy. Guy just so happens to be smart, handsome, and completely at ease with himself. Good thing she bumped into him in a hospital.
Yep.
I'm actually not going to spend time summarizing this book because it would just be one 'girly' situation to the next.
HOWEVER, the 'girly' situations are well thought out as we see Dom's initial reaction, how she works through it, and what she decides on (all reasoning seems sound most of the time, other times it is irrational and she DOES admit to it).
It is a good exploration into the quest of sex-ships versus relationships and while it does take place for a college freshman soon to be college sophomore, I think there is a lot that sexually budding teenagers could relate to. There's another HOWEVER here, I don't think the book really encourages sex. It just enlightens the possibilities of what is, what could be, and seems to generate a carpe diem attitude. AND ALSO HOW TO BE SAFE. YAY SAFETY!!!
Also, there's a particular moment I laughed at; when Dom manages to hit Guy's man tackle with a plate (on accident). Goodness gracious.
This book isn't particularly full of laughs, but it is charming and is a bumpy exploration book.
I do like how it leaves without a resolute ending because hopefully, at such a young age, life isn't going to end.
Meh.
Personal growth, better understanding of self, better understanding of relationships, and all kind of meshed into this book.
Happy reading!
I have TWO disclaimers for this book! TITILLATING ISN'T IT?
First disclaimer: I didn't fully comprehend this is a sequel to Anatomy of a Boyfriend and gleefully read this book anyways. I probably missed out on some quality character building time and coming of age confidence, but I think the second book hinted and covered a lot of what transpired in the first book that I feel comfortable not reading it.
Second disclaimer: In case you couldn't tell by the title or the book cover, this book does have sex in it. Sex as a topic, sex as a scene, and ways to be safe about sex. If that makes you uncomfortable, read no further. However, I would say that the sex scenes are reduced to simply stating they had sex, where they had it, and very mundane details. It's not anywhere near a pornographic novel, but it more refers to sex like talking about the weather; it's there, everyone is familiar with the weather, but no one needs to discuss it in detail to know exactly what the weather is. So if that doesn't dissuade you, carry on.
Now, to the amazon summary so you can have a more depicted picture of what you're getting into, "With Judy Blume-like honesty and insight, this sequel to Anatomy of a Boyfriend is about life after first love--romance, sex, friendship, family, and the ups and downs of life as a single girl.
After everything that happened—my first boyfriend, my first time, my first breakup—jumping back into the dating game seemed like the least healthy thing I could do. It’s not that I didn’t want to fall in love again, since that’s about the best feeling ever. But as a busy college premed still raw from heartbreak, which is the worst feeling ever, I figured I’d lie low for a while. Of course, as soon as I stopped looking for someone, an impossibly amazing—and devastatingly cute—guy came along, and I learned that having a new boyfriend is the quickest way to recover from losing your old one. The moment we got together, all my preconceptions about romance and sex were turned upside down. I discovered physical and emotional firsts I never knew existed. I learned to let go of my past by living in the present. It was thrilling. It was hot. It was just what the doctor ordered. But I couldn’t avoid my future forever. In Daria Snadowsky’s daring follow-up to Anatomy of a Boyfriend, eighteen-year-old Dominique explores the relationship between love and lust, and the friendships that see us through." AMAZON LINK OF DRAMATIC NOISES
So Dom, Dominque, whichever you like better isn't exactly the most charming of narrators. I gathered based on context clues that her first relationship she liked because she was in love and sought to strengthen that through sex. In the end, when they went off to college, it seems that they broke up and Dom was super heart broken about it. There are a lot of words in this book that seem to 'over-emphasize' what happened; just as a heads up.
So Dom has returned home for the summer in kind of an inner turmoil of lamenting about her dead relationship, trying to enjoy her friendship with Amy, and of course bumping into Guy. Guy just so happens to be smart, handsome, and completely at ease with himself. Good thing she bumped into him in a hospital.
Yep.
I'm actually not going to spend time summarizing this book because it would just be one 'girly' situation to the next.
HOWEVER, the 'girly' situations are well thought out as we see Dom's initial reaction, how she works through it, and what she decides on (all reasoning seems sound most of the time, other times it is irrational and she DOES admit to it).
It is a good exploration into the quest of sex-ships versus relationships and while it does take place for a college freshman soon to be college sophomore, I think there is a lot that sexually budding teenagers could relate to. There's another HOWEVER here, I don't think the book really encourages sex. It just enlightens the possibilities of what is, what could be, and seems to generate a carpe diem attitude. AND ALSO HOW TO BE SAFE. YAY SAFETY!!!
Also, there's a particular moment I laughed at; when Dom manages to hit Guy's man tackle with a plate (on accident). Goodness gracious.
This book isn't particularly full of laughs, but it is charming and is a bumpy exploration book.
I do like how it leaves without a resolute ending because hopefully, at such a young age, life isn't going to end.
Meh.
Personal growth, better understanding of self, better understanding of relationships, and all kind of meshed into this book.
Happy reading!
Monday, March 4, 2013
Monstrous Beauty
Monstrous Beauty by Elizabeth Fama
An amazon summary, "Fierce, seductive mermaid Syrenka falls in love with Ezra, a young naturalist. When she abandons her life underwater for a chance at happiness on land, she is unaware that this decision comes with horrific and deadly consequences. Almost one hundred forty years later, seventeen-year-old Hester meets a mysterious stranger named Ezra and feels overwhelmingly, inexplicably drawn to him. For generations, love has resulted in death for the women in her family. Is it an undiagnosed genetic defect . . . or a curse? With Ezra’s help, Hester investigates her family’s strange, sad history. The answers she seeks are waiting in the graveyard, the crypt, and at the bottom of the ocean - but powerful forces will do anything to keep her from uncovering her connection to Syrenka and to the tragedy of so long ago." AMAZON LINK OF WEIRD
So that summary wasn't half bad, although I draw severe issue with the line, "When she abandons her life underwater for a chance at happiness on land, she is unaware that this decision comes with horrific and deadly consequences." It's not her decision to be on land that comes with horrific and deadly consequences that she's unaware of, she's totally aware of the crap she had to do just to be on land. All of the other stuff is simply a result of humans.
Anyways.
So the book begins with Hester being in crush (I'm not going to call it love, I'd settle for unrequited love) with her friend Peter, and they have a very cute friendship. Hester is hung up on not being in love or being with someone due to the genetic craziness in her family. Her mother died giving birth to her, her grandmother died giving birth to her mother, and her great grandmother died giving birth to her mother, etc etc. It's not a determined medical complication or anything like that, it just appears that the mom's start to waste away once the child is born.
Weird.
So Hester goes about her life trying not to get close to anyone to prevent herself from falling in love, etc. She winds up at a party due to Peter and wanders off to the beach to a cave where a dude from the party tries to hit on her but a mysterious man saves her and Hester wanders away safely with no idea who her savior is.
The neat thing about this book is that is flashes back and forth between Hester and Syrenka. Syrenka is a mermaid (No, not like The Little Mermaid) that longs to be on land with Ezra. Syrenka's parts happen in the 1870's area. In the prologue of the book there's a scene of Syrenka falling in love with a human man a long time ago (Mermaids are immortal) and accidentally drowns him before falling to anguish. So Syrenka became more careful about the humans she has encounters with and Ezra kind of happens upon her (and she on him). So they start a love story.
Meanwhile Hester is trying to figure out her medical issues and having little 'rules' that will help in her current life to prevent misfortune. However, she begins to wonder about a curse that appears to happen in the little historical church of her town. It turns out that Hester is a bit of a history buff and does her research at the library (like a badass) and the mystery starts to slowly reveal itself.
The story itself is pretty neat and I picked out some quotes this time to highlight particular parts or phrases I enjoyed.
"She should have remembered this from her school assignments: the only way to look anything up on microform, other than educated guessing or browsing, was to know the exact date of the event you were searching for," (Fama, page 79, Monstrous Beauty). This happens in the middle of her doing research at the library, so I probably more enjoyed this for the simple geek factor AND willing to put in time and effort into something worth knowing. Yay for not solely relying on Google! WHOO! INTELLIGENCE!
So we already know that Hester's family has a long line of female's giving birth to females and then promptly dying for unknown reasons. I found this quote beautiful as Hester really delves into that situation, "She cried for Malcolm [her father] and her grandfather for losing Susan [Hester's mother], for Susan for losing her entire future, and for Nancy [Hester's step-mom], who filled another woman's shoes with such grace," (Fama, page 100, Monstrous Beauty). That entire sentiment really shows Hester's passionate nature where with a closer look at the book, she may seem to operate and make decisions based on logic, intelligence, etc; but those decisions are often prompted by an emotional reaction. I think that Hester has the right affection for her step-mom and I'm terribly glad that this seemed to be another book where the mother dies, the mother figure is still present with Nancy. She might not be the biological mother, but she is the mother that Hester knows.
Okay, one last quote and I'll be done here. I just found this silly/adorable and a good characterization of Hester and Peter's relationship. To preface this conversation, being a history buff, Hester works at a re-enactment area where they bring the old Plymouth to life for tourists (Yes, the original Plymouth of America). "[Hester] 'I'm way too tired to change. I'll just be a dork for another fifteen minutes.' He [Peter] patted her head. 'You're not a dork, you're adorkable,'" (Fama, page 108, Monstrous Beauty).
Final thoughts on the book. It was one of the more likable mermaid tales I've read simply because it ran as far away from The Little Mermaid as it could (within reason, I mean they have to be half-fish people to be mermaids). It wasn't the best thing I've read as I got mildly annoyed with the character as I kept figuring things out WAYYY before she did, but I thought it had a lot of good fantasy and mystery elements to it. Towards the end got a little weird, but it did wrap up well-enough.
Happy reading!
An amazon summary, "Fierce, seductive mermaid Syrenka falls in love with Ezra, a young naturalist. When she abandons her life underwater for a chance at happiness on land, she is unaware that this decision comes with horrific and deadly consequences. Almost one hundred forty years later, seventeen-year-old Hester meets a mysterious stranger named Ezra and feels overwhelmingly, inexplicably drawn to him. For generations, love has resulted in death for the women in her family. Is it an undiagnosed genetic defect . . . or a curse? With Ezra’s help, Hester investigates her family’s strange, sad history. The answers she seeks are waiting in the graveyard, the crypt, and at the bottom of the ocean - but powerful forces will do anything to keep her from uncovering her connection to Syrenka and to the tragedy of so long ago." AMAZON LINK OF WEIRD
So that summary wasn't half bad, although I draw severe issue with the line, "When she abandons her life underwater for a chance at happiness on land, she is unaware that this decision comes with horrific and deadly consequences." It's not her decision to be on land that comes with horrific and deadly consequences that she's unaware of, she's totally aware of the crap she had to do just to be on land. All of the other stuff is simply a result of humans.
Anyways.
So the book begins with Hester being in crush (I'm not going to call it love, I'd settle for unrequited love) with her friend Peter, and they have a very cute friendship. Hester is hung up on not being in love or being with someone due to the genetic craziness in her family. Her mother died giving birth to her, her grandmother died giving birth to her mother, and her great grandmother died giving birth to her mother, etc etc. It's not a determined medical complication or anything like that, it just appears that the mom's start to waste away once the child is born.
Weird.
So Hester goes about her life trying not to get close to anyone to prevent herself from falling in love, etc. She winds up at a party due to Peter and wanders off to the beach to a cave where a dude from the party tries to hit on her but a mysterious man saves her and Hester wanders away safely with no idea who her savior is.
The neat thing about this book is that is flashes back and forth between Hester and Syrenka. Syrenka is a mermaid (No, not like The Little Mermaid) that longs to be on land with Ezra. Syrenka's parts happen in the 1870's area. In the prologue of the book there's a scene of Syrenka falling in love with a human man a long time ago (Mermaids are immortal) and accidentally drowns him before falling to anguish. So Syrenka became more careful about the humans she has encounters with and Ezra kind of happens upon her (and she on him). So they start a love story.
Meanwhile Hester is trying to figure out her medical issues and having little 'rules' that will help in her current life to prevent misfortune. However, she begins to wonder about a curse that appears to happen in the little historical church of her town. It turns out that Hester is a bit of a history buff and does her research at the library (like a badass) and the mystery starts to slowly reveal itself.
The story itself is pretty neat and I picked out some quotes this time to highlight particular parts or phrases I enjoyed.
"She should have remembered this from her school assignments: the only way to look anything up on microform, other than educated guessing or browsing, was to know the exact date of the event you were searching for," (Fama, page 79, Monstrous Beauty). This happens in the middle of her doing research at the library, so I probably more enjoyed this for the simple geek factor AND willing to put in time and effort into something worth knowing. Yay for not solely relying on Google! WHOO! INTELLIGENCE!
So we already know that Hester's family has a long line of female's giving birth to females and then promptly dying for unknown reasons. I found this quote beautiful as Hester really delves into that situation, "She cried for Malcolm [her father] and her grandfather for losing Susan [Hester's mother], for Susan for losing her entire future, and for Nancy [Hester's step-mom], who filled another woman's shoes with such grace," (Fama, page 100, Monstrous Beauty). That entire sentiment really shows Hester's passionate nature where with a closer look at the book, she may seem to operate and make decisions based on logic, intelligence, etc; but those decisions are often prompted by an emotional reaction. I think that Hester has the right affection for her step-mom and I'm terribly glad that this seemed to be another book where the mother dies, the mother figure is still present with Nancy. She might not be the biological mother, but she is the mother that Hester knows.
Okay, one last quote and I'll be done here. I just found this silly/adorable and a good characterization of Hester and Peter's relationship. To preface this conversation, being a history buff, Hester works at a re-enactment area where they bring the old Plymouth to life for tourists (Yes, the original Plymouth of America). "[Hester] 'I'm way too tired to change. I'll just be a dork for another fifteen minutes.' He [Peter] patted her head. 'You're not a dork, you're adorkable,'" (Fama, page 108, Monstrous Beauty).
Final thoughts on the book. It was one of the more likable mermaid tales I've read simply because it ran as far away from The Little Mermaid as it could (within reason, I mean they have to be half-fish people to be mermaids). It wasn't the best thing I've read as I got mildly annoyed with the character as I kept figuring things out WAYYY before she did, but I thought it had a lot of good fantasy and mystery elements to it. Towards the end got a little weird, but it did wrap up well-enough.
Happy reading!
Saturday, March 2, 2013
Level 2
Level 2: Book 1 of the Memory Chronicles by Lenore Applehans
An amazon summary before I expose how far I read and why I CANNOT FINISH THIS CURSED TEXT, "In this gripping exploration of a futuristic afterlife, a teen discovers that death is just the beginning.
Felicia herself is completely irrational when she decides to do something and then a male character quips some logic into her plan, she miraculously reconsiders and decides to do something more reasonable. It's always a male character that rationalizes her too, as if all female characters cannot have a mind to think for themselves and are only obsessed with flirting/love/painting nails.
An amazon summary before I expose how far I read and why I CANNOT FINISH THIS CURSED TEXT, "In this gripping exploration of a futuristic afterlife, a teen discovers that death is just the beginning.
Since her untimely death the day before her eighteenth birthday, Felicia Ward has been trapped in Level 2, a stark white afterlife located between our world and the next. Along with her fellow drones, Felicia passes the endless hours reliving memories of her time on Earth and mourning what she’s lost—family, friends, and Neil, the boy she loved.
Then a girl in a neighboring chamber is found dead, and nobody but Felicia recalls that she existed in the first place. When Julian—a dangerously charming guy Felicia knew in life—comes to offer Felicia a way out, Felicia learns the truth: If she joins the rebellion to overthrow the Morati, the angel guardians of Level 2, she can be with Neil again.
Suspended between Heaven and Earth, Felicia finds herself at the center of an age-old struggle between good and evil. As memories from her life come back to haunt her, and as the Morati hunt her down, Felicia will discover it’s not just her own redemption at stake… but the salvation of all mankind." AMAZON SUMMARY OF NOOOO
I'm going to clarify something.
I read books for fun at this stage in my life. I no longer have to read Heart of Darkness or The Grapes of Wrath or any mandatory educational texts.
As such, I feel no qualms in putting down a book that has quite literally given me a headache.
This, this book is atrocious. And here's why.
1) I gave this book an overly fair chance to DO something. I read to page 188 and then calmly set the book down before seeking out some Tylenol. Then sentence, "A wave of psychological nausea pounds me into submission," just made me STOP and will my brain into a safer place of remembering the awesome of Seraphina (Page 188, Level 2, Applehans).
2) The book is only 281 pages, I am less than 100 pages from the end and nothing quite makes sense still. NOTHING. They keep quipping random 'history' and memories of this TRAGIC GIRL (like bloo hoo hoo everywhere) and again, brain hurt.
So this is what I've learned in the 188 pages that I read.
There's a girl named Felicia and she's dead (and we don't know how, even at page 188) and she's in some sort of Limbo area. It's referred to as Level 2 periodically because it's one step after death (I think). So they spend their time reliving their memories and accessing other people's memories for credits (like a giant Facebook but with memories) and it really sounds like the Matrix on religion.
Oh yeah, they have these awesome [/sarcasm] little religious gems tucked in everywhere. The book expects you (the reader) to be familiar with the Christian faith. As such, you're also supposed to believe in the Greek mythology of the five different rivers of the Underworld. The book also wants you to think it's totally cool that it's trying to immerse you in a religious matrix where the guardians of the matrix are upset with God for making them work in the Matrix. They explained it as there are the angels who were opposed to God creating humans went to hell, the angels that gave unwavering support to God got to hang out in heaven (like cool kids), and then the 'luke-warm' angels (I'm not kidding they actually say luke-warm) were sent to monitor Level 2. Which is limbo? They make it seem like Limbo, it's basically full of people who need to come to terms with their life and death and then get to Heaven.
Now the angels who are in Level 2 are eventually referred to as the Morati (which suspiciously reminded me of Moriarty like the Sherlock Holmes villain, no I don't think there's a connection there but I got absurdly hopeful). The Morati are super upset that God put them there and are using the HUMANS AS BATTERIES TO AMASS POWER TO FIGHT GOD. Over half of that was the premise of the Matrix. On page 123, the main character Felicia thinks, "It sounds like something straight out of The Matrix." HUR HUR HUR.
So the world of Level 2 is basically a giant space of bee hive looking things. Inside the bee hives each person has their own memory interface or 'cell' and there's not a lot of common space to hang out in. There are roads that connect all the different bee hives. That's all I got for you.
Now Felicia is too dumb to live. At the beginning she's like, "Man, this limbo weird world sucks, but I'm tired so I'm going to go relive more memories. LOL. I HAVE A TORMENTED PAST. WEIRD ALLUSIONS TO THINGS. Also, I might be a hacker." Felicia gets 'rescued' by another character who she hate/loves/hate/hate/hate/is deeply attracted to/loves/HATE can't make up her mind about. His name is Julian and he's drop dead gorgeous and blah blah blah. He's less annoying than Felicia, but still pretty annoying.
The book has given me no reason to care about Felicia because she's gaga in love with Neil and has allegedly done something horribly tragic that she can never think about so we (the readers) have no idea what she's done.
I just don't care. I don't care.
This paragraph really made me gag, "[Neil just called her pretty] It catches me so off guard, a hot blush blooms in my chest and rapidly spreads up my neck and across my face. I know I'm attractive, physically at least. Plenty of people have told me that through the years. Little does Neil know how ugly I am on the inside. He can't see the scars," (Level 2, page 131, Applehans). OH GOD, I KNOW I'M PRETTY, BUT IT'S SO DIFFERENT WHEN NEIL TELLS ME, BUT HE WOULDN'T LIKE ME IF HE KNEW MY DEEP DARKEST SECRET OH GOD PASTTTTT. I just brain vomit at that.
Felicia herself is completely irrational when she decides to do something and then a male character quips some logic into her plan, she miraculously reconsiders and decides to do something more reasonable. It's always a male character that rationalizes her too, as if all female characters cannot have a mind to think for themselves and are only obsessed with flirting/love/painting nails.
So things happen, it's revealed that in Level 2 if you get unhooked from the system you can start performing matter manipulation which sounds kind of cool but then she is able to do it, makes real clothes for herself, and then proceeds to use her ability to paint her nails.
I'm just done. This book is unreadable.
That makes two.
I'm really glad I had some Tylenol.
Happy reading.
Edit: DISCLAIMER. I didn't like this book because the writing was horrible and the bringing together of the composition was terrible, the characters were utterly unlikable, and nothing exciting happened.
HOWEVER, I do not take issue with the 'Christian' content of the book, I find it interesting when authors try to use Christian concepts and themes in their books. That never discourages me from reading a book. However, if you write a horrible book, I'm not going to like it regardless if it has Christian themes or not. If you write a horrible book that has any other religious based content in it, I'm not going to like it. If you write a horrible book about murder, rape, mystery, science fiction, or any other genre or 'touchy topic', I'm not going to like it.
If you write a horrible book, I'm not going to like it.
That's the end line.
SO PLEASE STOP FLOODING MY EMAIL.
If you don't like what I blog about, guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ IT.
The internet is this marvelous thing where you (THE USER, YES YOU) get to pick and chose EXACTLY what you view.
Don't like what I have to say? YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ IT.
Close the window. Go enjoy something you do like. IT'S OKAY.
Oh my goodness. Calm down.
Have a nice whatever time of day your are viewing this.
Happy reading.
Edit: DISCLAIMER. I didn't like this book because the writing was horrible and the bringing together of the composition was terrible, the characters were utterly unlikable, and nothing exciting happened.
HOWEVER, I do not take issue with the 'Christian' content of the book, I find it interesting when authors try to use Christian concepts and themes in their books. That never discourages me from reading a book. However, if you write a horrible book, I'm not going to like it regardless if it has Christian themes or not. If you write a horrible book that has any other religious based content in it, I'm not going to like it. If you write a horrible book about murder, rape, mystery, science fiction, or any other genre or 'touchy topic', I'm not going to like it.
If you write a horrible book, I'm not going to like it.
That's the end line.
SO PLEASE STOP FLOODING MY EMAIL.
If you don't like what I blog about, guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ IT.
The internet is this marvelous thing where you (THE USER, YES YOU) get to pick and chose EXACTLY what you view.
Don't like what I have to say? YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ IT.
Close the window. Go enjoy something you do like. IT'S OKAY.
Oh my goodness. Calm down.
Have a nice whatever time of day your are viewing this.
Happy reading.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




